A Cyber Attack On NATO Could Trigger Article 5

Few nations have sophisticated cyber capabilities and for operational security reasons, they are closely guarded, rarely shared, and carefully used.

The US Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner warned Russian President  that waging a cyber attack against a NATO country could risk embroiling Moscow in a war against multiple Western governments, including the United States. 

In 2019 NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said all 29 member countries would respond to a serious cyber-attack on one of them.

Recently a NATO official told Reuters that a cyber attack could be considered an armed attack and trigger "Article 5," it was a significant moment. How significant is harder to judge. "Article 5" is NATO's holy grail, the core of what NATO is about. It is part of the Washington Treaty, signed in 1949, that set up the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which started with 12 members and now has 30.

Article 5 states, "The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all."

Mircea Geoană, Deputy Secretary General of NATO, says that when the alliance decided that cyber should be considered an “operational domain,” the bloc also made the call that a “massive cyber attack” on one member state could trigger Article 5 of NATO’s Washington Treaty. This strikes at the heart of the alliance’s defense clause, which states that an attack on one country is considered an attack on all allies.

So, for instance an attack on Poland is effectively the same as an attack on the United States, a powerful deterrent to a potential aggressor, but of course life is never that simple.

For decades it seemed simpler, as an armed attack would be obvious and NATO nations would respond with tanks, artillery, and warplanes. Now, in our new world, nations can be undermined through information warfare and infrastructure crippled by cyber attacks, often difficult to trace.

How NATO should respond to such attacks created much debate, first on the principles of whether a cyber attack could be considered an "armed attack," and secondly if it is, what to do about it.

So, if for instance Poland was attacked with tanks, individual nations are not obliged to respond with military force. Article 5 is powerful but how nations individually respond, with a lot or a little, is still up to them. Nevertheless, a conventional military attack on a NATO nation would get a massive response. Deterrence has worked.

But when we move into the grey zone of "hybrid warfare" that response is harder to predict.

This is one of the aims of Russian strategy towards NATO, to achieve its goals while operating below the threshold that will trigger Article 5. On cyber, those waters will be even muddier given how deniable activity is within cyberspace. In 2014, NATO's leaders made cyber defence a core part of collective defence but policy and activities to implement that decision are still evolving. To that end, for instance, it has a technical agreement with the European Union and a NATO Industry Cyber Partnership. At SHAPE, NATO's military headquarters, there is also a Cyberspace Operations Centre.

Currently, NATO is far more focused on defensive cyber, to secure its systems from attack, and the nature of that is a point of debate.

Some commentators say that passive cyber defence, where you simply build up your virtual walls, leaves the initiative with your adversary, enabling him to probe without consequence until he finds your weak point. Effective defence means also going after the attacker and forcing him onto the back foot, so-called offensive cyber. That is also what would be needed if NATO's responding to an Article 5 breach.

 NATO as an institution does not possess significant cyber capabilities. When it comes to activities, NATO is a command and control organisation using hardware and personnel loaned by members.

Few nations have sophisticated cyber capabilities and for operational security reasons, they are closely guarded, rarely shared, and carefully used. That means if a cyber attack did trigger NATO Article 5, then the actual use of cyber weapons would be outsourced to nations for use on behalf of the Alliance in a coordinated manner. However, as the NATO source told Reuters, a response does not have to be symmetrical, and could theoretically escalate to include a military one.

Persuading 30 nations to agree on this will be hard, and a further possibility is if NATO cannot agree there could be a so-called "coalition of the willing" operating separately. NATO has previously agreed cyber attacks could trigger Article 5, and that itself was a major decision and something of a deterrent to hostile actors. But the reality of having to act on it is now closer than ever before.

Reuters:      BBC:      Cyber Security Dive:     Daily Mail:       C-Span:      GZero

You Might Also Read: 

NATO & Ukraine Agree Deeper Cyber Co-operation:

 

« Making Sense Of The Edge
Twitter Joins Ukraine’s War Effort »

ManageEngine
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Check Point

Directory of Suppliers

Jooble

Jooble

Jooble is a job search aggregator operating in 71 countries worldwide. We simplify the job search process by displaying active job ads from major job boards and career sites across the internet.

Tines

Tines

The Tines security automation platform helps security teams automate manual tasks, making them more effective and efficient.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

APWG

APWG

APWG is the international coalition unifying the global response to cybercrime across industry, government, law-enforcement and NGO communities.

Australian Cyber Security Growth Network (AustCyber)

Australian Cyber Security Growth Network (AustCyber)

AustCyber brings together businesses and researchers to develop the next generation of cyber security products and services.

ClickDatos

ClickDatos

ClickDatos specializes in consulting, auditing, data protection training, accredited by ISO/IEC 27001 certification.

Avatier

Avatier

Avatier identity management software products automate identity access management, user provisioning and IT governance to ensure information security and compliance.

VADO Security Technologies

VADO Security Technologies

VADO Security enables the safe transfer of data between low & high security networks.

ISMS Accreditation Center (ISMS-AC)

ISMS Accreditation Center (ISMS-AC)

ISMS-AC is the national accreditation body for Japan. The directory of members provides details of organisations offering certification services for ISO 27001.

Capsule8

Capsule8

Capsule8 is the only company providing high-performance attack protection for Linux production environments.

Partnership for Conflict, Crime and Security Research (PaCCS)

Partnership for Conflict, Crime and Security Research (PaCCS)

PaCCS delivers high quality and cutting edge research to improve our understanding of current and future global security challenges in areas including cybersecurity.

HackControl

HackControl

HackControl services include penetration tests, security audits, block chain audits and brand and anti-phishing protection.

Authomize

Authomize

Authomize aggregates identities and authorization mechanisms from any applications around your hybrid environment into one unified platform so you can easily and rapidly manage and secure all users.

Conference on Applied Machine Learning in Information Security (CAMLIS)

Conference on Applied Machine Learning in Information Security (CAMLIS)

CAMLIS is a venue for discussing applied research on machine learning, deep learning and data science in information security.

iManage

iManage

iManage's intelligent, cloud-enabled, secure knowledge work platform enables organizations to uncover and activate the knowledge that exists inside their business.

Neosoft

Neosoft

Néosoft is an independent digital transformation consulting group with expertise in Consulting & Agility, Cybersecurity, Data, DevOps, Infrastructure & Cloud and Software Engineering.

AKIPS

AKIPS

AKIPS develops the world's most scalable network and infrastructure monitoring software, delivered as a turn-key software appliance.

Blackwire Labs

Blackwire Labs

Blackwire.ai is the first multidisciplinary cybersecurity advisor, powered by AI and trained by cybersecurity experts to enhance your team's capabilities and improve resilience.

Shieldeum

Shieldeum

Shieldeum offer a Secure AI Infrastructure Layer build on Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network.