Cyber Resilience Benchmarks - Missed

In its 3rd Annual State of Cyber Resilience Survey the experts at Accenture questioned 4,644 executives representing companies with annual revenues of at least $1 billion. They came from 24 industries and 16 countries across North and South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Nearly all respondents (98%) were the sole or key decision maker regarding their organisation’s cyber security strategy and spending.

The survey found that some organisations are getting better at security basics with direct attacks down 11% compared to last year and security breaches dropped 27%. It also found that most companies, on average, spend 10.9% of their IT budgets on cybersecurity and they are spending their money wisely investing in advanced technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, and automation. 

According to Accenture, 84% of organisations spend more than 20% of their cyber security budgets on tools that use these advanced technologies for detection and response. This is up from 67% of cyber security spending three years ago.

Companies that want to compete must go digita, but the digital world has become complex andp rotecting against online threats, via cyber security, is a tough problem for businesses large and small.  

The top firms make the most of their security investments, but the worst have much lower threat detection rates, great adverse impacts and downtimes after a cyberattack, and more customer data being exposed. Accenture says companies experience an average of 22 security incidents annually, which equals a potential saving of $6 million per year for the least capable.

Here are four things that separate the leaders from the laggards:

1.They use the right metrics.
As costs rise and the number of third-party threats grows, it's even more critical that the money spent on security actually delivers effective and efficient results. Companies that get digital right spend to enhance operational speed, extract value from new investments, and sustain what they have. 

The least capable companies focus on measuring their cyber resilience, but the leaders want to know how quickly they're getting to that destination. 

According to Accenture, leaders take pride in how fast they can detect a security breach, mobilise a response, and return to business as normal. They also measure their resiliency, the number of systems that were compromised or stopped, and for how long, and how accurately they were able to pinpoint cyber incidents.  While leaders look for speed of threat detection, mitigation, and recovery, the non-leaders are more concerned with the outcomes they want to achieve: cyber operational technology resilience, repetition (the portion of breaches that come from repeated attempts of the same type), and cyber IT resiliency.

The non-leaders ought to rethink their priorities to gauge and ramp up how fast they detect, respond, and recover from cyber threats. They should replicate the methods leaders use to assess cybersecurity performance to attain higher levels of resilience.

2. They value speed.
Bouncing back from a security incident quickly is critical to minimising damage and reducing the impact on the organisation. That's why leaders who embrace speed say that 83% of the security incidents they experienced made little or no impact on their organisation's operations.

The leaders make the most of current technology. Artificial intelligence and machine learning was cited as the No. 1 source to detect and respond to incidents quickly. Such tools enable security leaders to find and remediate damage nearly three times faster than companies that don't use such tools, the report finds.The non-leaders should think hard about putting money into technologies that enable them to measure their cybersecurity performance through metrics such as faster detection, faster mitigation, and shorter recovery times.

There are numerous security vendors and effective tools avialble and  there's no time to waste in mitigating the effects of an attack. Companies must carefully scrutinise their security-provider service-level agreements and make sure they align with the company's needs.

3. They reduce impacts.
The third point relates to the second, in that failing to take advantage of the most advanced security technology means that attacks can last longer and create greater disruption and higher costs for an organisation. 

Fifty-five percent of the top companies had a business impact that lasted for more than a day. Nearly all (93%) of the laggards made the same claim. Getting the organisational impact down to less than a day is hard, even the leaders struggle to do it, but right now it's a more urgent challenge for the non-leaders who have plenty of room to up their game.

One of the principal reasons for failure is that many organisations operate with low degrees of security automation and rely on humans to fend off attacks.  Human error is one of the most common reasons for things to go badly wrong.

That's why, over the last year, 13% of the security leaders faced charges of regulatory violations versus 19% of the non-leaders. Also, 19% of the latter incurred fines, as opposed to only 9% of leaders. As the EU's General Data Protection Regulation can levy fines of over $100 million for violations, it's clear that noncompliance could result in fines that are even higher than the already considerable downtime costs.

4. They're team players.
When asked about how much collaboration matters, 79% of the respondents in the Accenture survey opined that working with law enforcement, government, and the broader security community will be essential to fighting cybercrime in the future. 
Organisations that are best employ more than five ways to unite strategic partners, the security community, and internal resources to grow awareness and understanding of cybersecurity issues, are twice as good at protecting themselves against attacks than those who take a less-thorough approach.

Corporate governance is also undergoing some changes and reporting security to CEOs has increased by 8 percentage points, but reporting to the board has shrunk by 12%. 

Direct reports to the CIO are down about 5% year-on-year, reducing a possible conflict of interest between both realms, with a general drift to the CTO of about 10% over the same period, the Accenture report highlights. Employee training is one of the more larger areas for improvement. Thirty percent of the security leaders said they train more than three-quarters of the people who need training on new security tools. Among non-leaders, the figure is only 9%.

Conclusion
If there's anything the Accenture report shows, it's that everyone, even the security leaders, can do better. Whether they are leaders or laggards, organisations should look at hard at where they're falling short and make every effort to improve.
Ultimately Accenture identified three key differences: 

  • Leaders invest for operational speed. They prioritise how quickly they can detect a breach, how quickly they can mobilise their response, and how quickly they can get operations back to normal. 
  • Leaders scale, train, and collaborate more than non-leaders to increase the value of their security investments. 
  • Leaders place more emphasis on maintaining existing investments and performing better at security basics.

In every case, putting money into boosting operational speed, extracting value from security investments, and stewarding what they have will put an organisation on the right road to effective cyber security. 

Those who do this best tend to choose advanced technologies that help them detect and respond to cyber-attacks fast. Once they settle on a security solution, they roll it out quickly. Indeed, the number of leaders who invest over one-fifth of their budget in advanced technologies has grown twofold over the past three years. As a result, these leaders have become more confident in their ability to extract more value from their investments and are outperforming companies that don't take the same rigorous, proactive approach to cyber security.

Accenture:      Dark Reading:      IT Governance:       SDX Central:      TechRepublic

You Might Also Read: 

Why Cyber Training Is So Important For Business:


 

« Experts Aim To Combat COVID-19 Cyber Attacks
5G Security: Possible Risks & Challenges »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

ZenGRC

ZenGRC

ZenGRC - the first, easy-to-use, enterprise-grade information security solution for compliance and risk management - offers businesses efficient control tracking, testing, and enforcement.

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Renaissance

Renaissance

Renaissance is Ireland's premier value added distributor of IT security solutions and a leading independent provider of business continuity consultancy.

Secure India

Secure India

Secure India provides Forensic Solutions that help Government and Business in dealing with prevention and resolution of Cyber related threats.

Efecte

Efecte

Efecte is a Nordic SaaS company specialized in IT Service Management, Self-Service, Identity Management and Access Governance solutions.

NESEC

NESEC

NESEC is a specialist in information security consulting services and solutions.

Apricorn

Apricorn

Apricorn provides hardware-based 256-bit encrypted external storage products to companies and organizations that require high-level protection for their data at rest.

Cyacomb

Cyacomb

Cyacomb (formerly Cyan Forensics) provides digital forensics software to help police forces find evidence on computers many times faster than before.

Redstor

Redstor

Redstor's complete data management helps you discover, manage and control your data from a single control centre, unifying backup and recovery, disaster recovery, archiving and search and insight.

Secure Recruitment

Secure Recruitment

Secure Recruitment is a specialist Executive Search business that focuses its efforts on attracting specific exceptional talent in Cyber Security.

Trustelem

Trustelem

Trustelem offers European and global companies a ready-to-use access management service that respects the principles of sovereignty, territoriality and privacy.

Industrial Control System Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ICS-ISAC)

Industrial Control System Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ICS-ISAC)

ICS-ISAC is a non-profit, public/private Knowledge Sharing Center established to help facilities develop situational awareness in support of local, national and international security.

YorCyberSec

YorCyberSec

YorCyberSec act as a trusted Cyber and Information Security broker and procurement specialist. We help companies to Reduce Risk, Increase Assurance and Improve Performance.

StateRAMP

StateRAMP

StateRAMP reduces risk from unsecure cloud solutions and protects data by providing State and local governments a standardized approach for verifying and monitoring security postures.

Buchanan & Edwards

Buchanan & Edwards

Buchanan & Edwards delivers forward-focused technology solutions that help our clients transform the way they perform their missions.

Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD)

Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD)

DIVD's aim is to make the digital world safer by reporting vulnerabilities we find in digital systems to the people who can fix them.

Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI)

Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI)

AUVSI is the world's largest nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of uncrewed systems and robotics. Focus areas include cyber security for uncrewed systems and robotics.

Heyhack

Heyhack

Heyhack is a SOC 2 Type II certified automated penetration testing platform for web apps and APIs.

Jersey Cyber Security Centre (JCSC)

Jersey Cyber Security Centre (JCSC)

Jersey Cyber Security Centre is the jurisdiction's Cyber Emergency Response Team (CERT) and national technical authority for cyber security.