Cyber Threats And Nuclear Weapons Systems

It is accepted that all states are vulnerable to cyber threats. Yet, a majority of states have yet to develop coherent cyber strategies or implement sufficient preventive measures. 

Despite the increase in severe cyber incidents directed at national power plants, companies and nuclear-related military equipment, the threat of cyber interference in national nuclear weapons systems is not being properly tackled.

With multinational nuclear supply chains and nuclear command and control systems at risk of being compromised, this must be urgently addressed.

The more Complex, the more Vulnerable

Governments and legislators are struggling to keep pace with the rapid development of cyber capabilities. As military systems become more technically complex it would be easy to assume that they are more secure. The opposite is true.

Increased automation and connectivity increases vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks. Measures such as air-gapping a system (i.e. de-connecting it from the internet) can fall short.

A recent US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report assessed the cyber security of US weapons systems and found “mission critical cyber vulnerabilities in nearly all weapons systems […] under development.”

While the report does not make reference to any specific system type, one can reasonably assume that nuclear weapons systems are vulnerable to cyber-attacks.

Possible kinds of Cyber-Attacks

Cyber-attacks can take many forms. Activities range from cyber espionage, data theft, infiltration of nuclear command, control and communications (NC3), denial of service/distributed denial of service (DoS/DDoS) attacks, false alarms (jamming and spoofing), sabotage and physical damage. When directed against nuclear weapons systems, in the worst possible case this may escalate to a deliberate or inadvertent exchange of nuclear weapons.

Another area of concern is the supply chain, comprised of any hardware and software components belonging to the nuclear weapons system, including NC3, platforms, delivery systems and warheads.

The supply chain usually includes a string of companies and providers located in different countries with varying cyber security standards, which means there is room for manipulation and sabotage.

Take, for instance, a computer chip produced in country A. If a vulnerability were inserted at the production stage, it could then be remotely activated at a later point, when the chip is integrated into the military system of country B. If the attacker happened to be an “insider” with unlimited access to a military site, compromising military equipment could be easier.

This could be done for instance through an infected USB drive when security standards in a military facility happen to be low, leaving the victim of the attack unaware of the manipulation up until it is too late.

Limited awareness of Cyber Risks to Nuclear Systems

There is a lack of awareness within the expert community and among decision-makers and a reluctance by states to implement measures such as common cyber security standards and the sharing of information on vulnerabilities.

Among the nuclear weapons states, only in the United States have high-ranking officials, such as Gen. Robert Kehler (ret.) and Air Force Gen. John Hyten (STRATCOM), in two Senate Armed Service Committee hearings in 2013 and 2017 expressed their concerns about a potential cyber-attack affecting the US nuclear deterrent.

One reason why decision-makers and governments are unwilling to take these steps could be that it seems too unrealistic or improbable a threat, merely belonging to the worlds of science fiction and doomsday scenarios. But there is no reason to assume that the warnings of the GAO, the US 2017 Task Force on Cyber Deterrence or the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) are exaggerated.

Certainly, there has not yet been a major cyber-attack on a state-run nuclear weapons programme – at least none we have publicly heard of.

But there are, a string of examples of cyber interference, in nuclear installations or parts of the supply chain related to them.

These include: The Stuxnet attack in 2010 affecting over 15 Iranian nuclear facilities which slowed down the development of Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons programme; a massive cyber-attack on Lockheed Martin in 2009 during which thousands of confidential files on the US F35 Lightning II fighter aircraft were compromised by hackers.

Also the 2017 hacking of the THAAD missile defence system in South Korea; the 2009 Conficker Worm attack on the French Marine Nationale and a 2011 cyber espionage campaign on the French nuclear company Areva and deep worries over the WannaCry virus possibly targeting parts of the UK Trident system in 2017.

What should Decision-Makers and Policy-Makers do?

Governments need to grapple with how to handle rapidly developing cyber capabilities. A critical first step is to develop a better understanding of the threat, including by answering the following questions:

  • What are the possible targets within the entire supply chain, the nuclear weapons system itself and within the upgrades, modernization and maintenance processes? What kind of vulnerabilities do they have?
  • Who are the potential actors likely to carry out a serious cyber-attacks? Which state, non-state actor or state-sponsored group would have (1) an interest and (2) the resources and capabilities?

All states possessing nuclear weapons, hosting NATO nuclear weapons on their soil, or running a civil nuclear programme should conduct annual assessments of the cyber resilience of all systems in question.

No less important is improved information sharing on possible and actual vulnerabilities and lessons learned with large technology companies, suppliers, vendors and manufacturers, and the implementation of common security standards.

These companies are normally not keen to disclose information on vulnerabilities because of possible reputational damage or for fear of revealing details that potential hackers or competitors could exploit. Government and business must work closely together to overcome these challenges and address joint concerns.

Governments must also invest heavily in research activities in the framework of existing institutions such as the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCD COE), the EU CBRN Centres of Excellence, or in cooperation with the European External Action service (EEAS), the United Nations (UNICRI) and, of course, within national cyber security institutions.

Governments and decision-makers of the nuclear-armed states should also publicly acknowledge that cyber security for nuclear weapons systems is a top tier priority for the safety and security of national military programmes.

If the security of nuclear weapons is in question, this not only reduces their credibility and deterrent value but it also poses a massive safety and security risk. This is a risk that no government, population or company can or should manage alone.

European Leadership Network

You Might Also Read: 

Is the Pentagon Cloud Secure Enough to Hold Nuclear Secrets?:

UK’s Trident Nuclear Subs Vulnerability To Hackers:

 

 

« Limit The Duration Google Holds Your Data
Hackers Steal Bitcoins Worth $41m »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Our Supplier Directory lists 6,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout enables cyber security professionals to reduce cyber risk to their organization with proactive security solutions, providing immediate improvement in security posture and ROI.

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

ForeScout Technologies

ForeScout Technologies

ForeScout delivers pervasive network security by allowing organisations to continuously monitor & mitigate security exposures & cyberattacks.

a1qa

a1qa

a1qa specializes in the delivery of full-cycle software QA and application testing services.

Cyber, Space, & Intelligence Association (CSIA)

Cyber, Space, & Intelligence Association (CSIA)

CSIA focuses on issues critical to Cyber Security, Military Space and Intelligence.

CyberDef

CyberDef

CyberDef is a consulting company specialising in cyber defence services for small and medium enterprises.

Exostar

Exostar

Exostar is the cloud platform of choice for secure enterprise and supply chain collaboration solutions and identity and access management expertise.

DataArt

DataArt

DataArt is a global technology consultancy that designs, develops and supports unique software solutions. Areas of activity include software security testing.

CyCognito

CyCognito

CyCognito empowers companies to take full control over their attack surface by uncovering and eliminating the critical security risks they didn't even know existed.

ValidSoft

ValidSoft

ValidSoft is a security software company, providing telecommunications-based multi-factor authentication, identity and transaction verification technology.

Blue Cedar

Blue Cedar

Blue Cedar's mobile app security integration platform secures and accelerates mobile app deployment for enterprises and government organizations around the world.

Secure Systems Innovation Corp (SSIC)

Secure Systems Innovation Corp (SSIC)

SSIC is a cyber risk analytics firm whose mission is to improve how businesses manage cyber risk through the power of data analytics. SSIC developed the X-Analytics cyber risk decisioning platform.

BugDazz

BugDazz

BugDazz pentest as a service (PTaaS) platform helps bringing in real-time results, detail coverage, & easy remediation workflows with compliance-ready reports.

BlueAlly

BlueAlly

BlueAlly helps clients scale, optimize, and manage their IT resources to reach their business goals.

LoughTec

LoughTec

LoughTec secure, manage and connect IT infrastructure for businesses and organisations throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland.

Yogosha

Yogosha

Yogosha is a crowdsourced cybersecurity platform enabling a win-win collaboration with the most talented hackers to detect and fix vulnerabilities on your most critical systems.

Ontinue

Ontinue

Ontinue ION is an MXDR service that provides Nonstop SecOps through five key capabilities that enable your organization to respond to attacks and continuously reduce risk.

First Focus

First Focus

First Focus is a managed service provider for medium-sized organisations.