Cybercrime Links To Russian State Hackers

In 2015, there were over one million cyber-attacks on individuals and companies every day, and that is why even the strongest US response to the theft of the Democratic National Committee emails will do little to deter future state-sponsored attacks, cybersecurity experts say.

The sheer volume and increasing sophistication of network attacks provide plausible deniability to state-sponsored groups, like the APT 28 and APT 29 thought to be behind the DNC hack, says Christopher Porter, of cybersecurity company FireEye.

“One of the key factors that makes these Russian operations doable is that sophisticated criminal groups have APT-like capabilities and go after similar targets,” said Porter, whose company first documented APT 29’s ties to the Kremlin in 2014.“The best criminals use some of the same tools that lower-end states might use.”

Recognizing the valuable cover this provides, the “Russian government has been intentionally blurring the lines between cyber activists, criminals and state-paid hackers,” said Jarno Limnell, vice president for cybersecurity at Insta Group Oy.

This makes it hard to conclusively attribute an attack to a particular government, and all but impossible to respond firmly. So Western countries have thus far remained “fairly quiet” in the face of various Russian provocations, and that has only emboldened Moscow, Limnell said.

“The increase in state-sponsored cyber-attacks of Russia is the result of a perception that there is not a significant ‘price to pay’ for such activities,” he said. “Russia will keep pushing more aggressive and sophisticated cyber operations as long as the West doesn’t push back.”

The restrained US response to the DNC theft fits that pattern. When asked about the motives behind the attack, President Barack Obama deferred to the ongoing FBI investigation, and simultaneously acknowledged the reality of Russia’s aggressive online behavior.

“What we do know is that the Russians hack our systems, not just government systems but private systems,” Obama told NBC in a recent interview. “What the motives were in terms of the leaks, all that, I can’t say directly. What I do know is that Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed admiration for Vladi­mir Putin.”

Russia’s information warfare, efforts to create a positive image of itself while “breaking the internal coherence” of its adversaries with tactics ranging from shutting down Ukraine’s power grid to deploying online troll armies to shape public opinion, is the central thread knitting together the country’s theory of Next-Generation Warfare, according to a review of the strategy published last year by the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales.

“The informational campaign is an uninterrupted (bezpriryvnost) strategic effort,” wrote Dima Adamsky, the study’s author and a professor of government, diplomacy and strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel. “It is waged during ‘peacetime’ and wartime, simultaneously in domestic, the adversary’s and international media domains and in all spheres of new media.”

The US government’s response to the DNC leak is unlikely to curtail the Russians’ use of offensive cyber campaigns, said Tobias Feakin of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Cyber-attacks and other informational manipulations of the socio-political landscapes are too well integrated into the Russian doctrine.

“The chances are that a strong public response would lead to Russian activity dropping for a short time, but more often than not this would pick up again once they felt the storm had passed, and they had developed new means of achieving the same goals,” said Feakin, the director of ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Center.

Longer-term solutions require a more comprehensive and serious approach, said Porter, who heads FireEye’s strategic intelligence and forecasting arm. Governments must tamp down sophisticated cyber-crime and deny state-sponsored attackers their camouflage. “A lack of attention to cyber-crime has enabled this to be something that’s doable,” he said. “Large-scale cyber-crime needs to be recognized as a national security issue.”

DefenseOne: http://bit.ly/2bbKb7l

 

« Anatomy Of Cyber Jihad
Benefits of Penetration Testing »

Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

CYRIN

CYRIN

CYRIN® Cyber Range. Real Tools, Real Attacks, Real Scenarios. See why leading educational institutions and companies in the U.S. have begun to adopt the CYRIN® system.

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Free Access: Cyber Security Supplier Directory listing 5,000+ specialist service providers.

Cylance Smart Antivirus

Cylance Smart Antivirus

An antivirus that works smarter, not harder, from BlackBerry. Lightweight, non-intrusive protection powered by artificial intelligence. BUY NOW - LIMITED DISCOUNT OFFER.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

Perimeter 81

Perimeter 81

Perimeter 81 is a Zero Trust Network as a Service designed to simplify secure network, cloud and application access for the modern and distributed workforce.

European Cybercrime Training and Education Group (ECTEG)

European Cybercrime Training and Education Group (ECTEG)

The primary aim of ECTEG is to enhance the coordination of cybercrime training, by identifying opportunities to build the capacity of countries to combat cybercrime

Advenica

Advenica

Advenica develops, manufactures and sells innovative cybersecurity solutions for encryption and secure information exchange.

Kasin Consulting

Kasin Consulting

Kasin Consulting is a management consulting company combining a deep understanding of the cyber domain with C-suite level business understanding.

Cyber Security Capital (CS^)

Cyber Security Capital (CS^)

Cyber Security Capital is a consultancy helping to mobilise and empower individuals, corporate leaders and entrepreneurs in cyber security.

InnoSec

InnoSec

InnoSec is a software manufacturer of cyber risk management technology.

Aujas

Aujas

Aujas helps organizations manage information security risks by protecting data, software, people and identities in alignment with best practices and compliance requirements.

NSO Group

NSO Group

NSO Group develops technology that enables government intelligence and law enforcement agencies to prevent and investigate terrorism and crime.

Cyber Threat Defense (CT Defense)

Cyber Threat Defense (CT Defense)

CT Defense specialize in penetration testing and security assessments.