Internet of Things: A Mass Surveillance Infrastructure

paxtechnica.jpg

The Internet of Things may set us free of lock us up, according to Philip Howard

The word “thing”, in Old English, means a meeting or assembly. In the epic poem Beowulf, the eponymous hero declares he’ll “alone hold a thing” with the monster Grendel, who is terrorising the Danes in the great hall of Heorot. Beowulf uses “thing” euphemistically – it is a meeting that immediately descends into a fight.

The Icelandic parliament is still called Althing (Alþingi). But over the ages, “things” have gradually evolved from meetings to matter. Today, we primarily use the term “thing” to refer to objects. Even in this sense, however, things are still core to our political and social lives.

An appreciation that things have always been about community and politics, whether literally, or through the creation and respect of systems of private property, provides a useful backdrop to the recent book, Pax Technica: How the Internet of Things May Set Us Free or Lock Us Up, by writer and professor of communication, Philip N Howard.
Howard’s thesis is that the much-hyped Internet of things - the expanding network of connected devices throughout our homes, bodies, streets and communities - heralds a new political age he calls “Pax Technica”.

This Pax will not be dominated by any one state, Howard argues, but by “a special kind of stability in global politics, revealing a pact between big technology firms and government”. The categories of democracy and dictatorship will fall. In their place, he claims, will be data-driven socio-technocracies, built on the intensive reporting of our behaviours, habits, tastes and beliefs, seamlessly transmitted by the devices we use, carry and interact with. We won’t need to express our political preferences and needs: our white goods and driverless cars will express them for us.
‘The most powerful political tool ever created’
Howard is excited by this vision; excited by two decades of work with communities empowered by social media; excited by the possibility to reinsert what he sees as civic counter power into device networks. I am not excited by it – I am terrified, and let me explain why.
The arc of Howard’s argument is that an open, interoperable, global network means that “every dictator will face embarrassing videos he cannot block and outrage he cannot respond to”, and every region in crisis or transition will involve “people using digital media to try to improve their conditions, to build new organisations, and to craft new institutional arrangements”.
The consequence, he submits, is “the most powerful political tool ever created”.
Howard adopts a playbook that is indistinguishable from the freedom-to-connect narrative fronted by US big tech and government – the valorisation of openness, interoperability, and disruptive innovation by private companies; the demonisation of repressive regimes; and a superficial view of political economy, international relations, and institutional corruption.
The argument is bolstered with an impressive array of case studies of citizen-led activism and coordination through mobile phones and social media. Inspiring stuff, certainly, but far from fully-worked examples of stable, enduring, empowering governance.

Howard fails to get out of the gates on the Internet of things. Apart from general hand waving to big data-enabled improvements in health, energy, environment and finance, he provides no convincing argument for the huge corporate and governmental data heist that will be enabled by networking everything in our physical environment, from our toasters to our coffee machines to our town squares. He claims that device networks will solve collective action problems, but there is little to show how this connectivity will empower the citizenry, as opposed to creating the greatest mass surveillance infrastructure ever conceived.

Howard acknowledges the dangers of surveillance, but he offers no opt-out. His solution to nefarious parties obtaining data is to just give out more data - to civic groups that he blithely assumes will organise and operate in the public good.
In this, he appears a convert to the church of big data; the computational theocracy. “Data will help us track good trends, monitor bad behaviour, and make reasoned decisions”, Howard claims. The world’s problems are all soluble, in other words, if only we have ever-more data and handfuls of networked citizen-analysts, thrown in amongst the vast machine of corporate and governmental data-miners.
Worryingly, Howard offers no challenge to the proposition that networked things will all communicate, seemingly by default, with “the original manufacturer, the information services we subscribe to, national security agencies, contractors, cloud computing services, and anyone else who has broken into, or been allowed into, the data stream”.
A nebulous trade-off
And the reason we ought to accept this unpalatable, feudal state of affairs? The lures of big data, and the venerated openness of the network. Your toaster is hackable, yes (as may be the rest of these smoking guns in your city), but at the same time, in a nebulous trade-off, with “dictators dying off and the data trail of bad behaviour growing, the biggest dirty networks are on the brink of collapse”. And when the “modern state fails, the internet of things will provide governance”, Howard asserts, unconvincingly.

By tracking us in intensive and intrusive ways – not only in our homes, but in our vehicles and bodies – data-driven devices can nudge, manipulate and mould our behaviours, habits and preferences, limit our autonomy, and bring quantification, segregation and discrimination to what is currently a political economy held together by social fuzziness.
This fuzziness assists us individually – because we have control over who has, and importantly who does not have, personal information about us. But it is also important socially, unless we want to turn into an intensely individualistic, segmented, micro-financialised network of semi-autonomous, tethered beings.
We deserve a smarter solution that offers more than empty marketing rhetoric for “open”, “inclusive” monopolistic big tech business models.

At worst, it’s a terrifying blueprint for the end of politics, depoliticising our engagement with “things”, characterising the objects and relations that furnish our lives as “loss leaders for data flows” – data flows that offer nothing for us, and everything for a staggering, uncontrolled array of corporate and governmental actors.
Guardian: http://bit.ly/1KtDA3x

« Avoid Hiring a Cybercriminal: understand motivations & thoroughly vet employees
US vs Hackers: Still Losing »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

CYRIN

CYRIN

CYRIN® Cyber Range. Real Tools, Real Attacks, Real Scenarios. See why leading educational institutions and companies in the U.S. have begun to adopt the CYRIN® system.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

Webroot

Webroot

Webroot delivers next-generation endpoint security and threat intelligence services to protect businesses and individuals around the globe.

UZCERT

UZCERT

UZCERT is the national Computer Emergency Response Team for Uzbekistan.

Ubisecure

Ubisecure

Ubisecure provide Identity & Access Management solutions.

First Response

First Response

First Response is a Cyber Incident Response and Digital Forensic Investigation company.

Appdome

Appdome

Appdome is the industry's first mobile integration as a service company, providing solutions for enterprise mobility and mobile application security.

K2 Integrity

K2 Integrity

K2 Integrity is a preeminent risk, compliance, investigations, and monitoring firm - built by industry leaders to safeguard our clients’ operations, reputations, and economic security.

SEC Consult

SEC Consult

SEC Consult is a leading European consultancy for application security services and information security.

BehavioSec

BehavioSec

BehavioSec uses the way your customers type, swipe, and hold their devices, and enables them to authenticate themselves through their own behavior patterns.

CryptoMill Cybersecurity Solutions

CryptoMill Cybersecurity Solutions

CryptoMill Cybersecurity Solutions provides advanced, innovative data security solutions for enterprises, professionals and individuals.

DreamIt Ventures

DreamIt Ventures

DreamIt Ventures is an early stage venture fund that accelerates startups building transformative tech products in the fields of Healthtech, Securetech, and Urbantech.

Cytenna

Cytenna

Cytenna Signal is a suite of SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) products that use AI and machine learning to automatically aggregate the latest information about software vulnerabilities.

Nitrokey

Nitrokey

Nitrokey is the world-leading company in open source security hardware. Nitrokey develops IT security hardware for data encryption, key management and user authentication.

Firmus

Firmus

As the leading penetration testing services provider in Malaysia, Firmus evaluates the ability of your internal or external information assets to withstand attacks.

Cyberwatch Finland

Cyberwatch Finland

Cyberwatch Finland's services improve decision-makers’ strategic situational picture and enable successful holistic cyber risk management.

NetWitness

NetWitness

NetWitness empowers security teams to rapidly detect today’s targeted and sophisticated attacks with unparalleled visibility.

watchTowr

watchTowr

Continuous Attack Surface Testing, with the watchTowr Platform. The future of Attack Surface Management.