Some Observations On Britain's New Cyber Security Strategy

A new strategy document spells out an assertive posture by a UK government that’s wary of some shared intelligence capabilities between allies.

At the beginning of November, with much fanfare, the United Kingdom released a new strategy that sets out UK government’s approach to improving the country’s cybersecurity over the next five years.

It follows the UK’s previous effort dating back to 2011, and allocates £1.9 billion ($2.36 billion) over five years, doubling the previous investment of £860 million ($1 billion). This newest five-year plan has the usual fare. It identifies the threats and vulnerabilities facing the UK, creates three pillars using alliteration (defend, deter and develop), and is filled with government-speak that could have been ripped from The Thick of It or Veep (“we need to invest in proofing ourselves against future threats”).

The threats the UK identifies are not surprising. It singles out Russian-language organized cybercrime, state-sponsored threats, terrorist groups (although it caveats that terrorist groups are likely to prefer physical attacks over digital ones for the time being), hacktivists, and oddly, script kiddies.

The strategy also points out the UK’s vulnerabilities, such as the proliferation of insecure internet of things devices, poor cyber hygiene, legacy and unpatched systems, and the availability of off-the-shelf hacking resources. These threats and vulnerabilities are not unique to the UK–every country connected to the internet faces identical or similar challenges.

There are Four Issues from the new Strategy

First, there seems to be an inherent tension between market incentives to spur better cybersecurity and regulation throughout the document. There’s a heavy emphasis placed on the importance of using a mix of intelligence sharing, incentives to spur the creation of cybersecurity products like certification schemes or incentives to create software that is “secure by default,” and using the government as a test case for cybersecurity approaches with the hopes that they cascade into the private sector.

However, the strategy recognizes that much of these same efforts were undertaken in the previous iteration of the strategy, with somewhat limited effect. The strategy leaves the door open to regulation but doesn’t elaborate on what that could look like. There’s also no mention of the EU network and information security directive, which the UK is still technically required to implement until it formally leaves the European Union.

Second, the strategy places heavy emphasis on taking “active cyber defense” measures to protect the UK. Generally, the term active cyber defense has been synonymous with hacking back, whereby companies and other non-government actors are allowed to retaliate in cyberspace and is controversial.

In its strategy, that’s not what the UK is advocating. Instead, active cyber defense is defined as a series of technical measures, taken by government in cooperation with industry (mostly communications service providers), to make it “significantly harder to attack UK internet services and users.”

The technical measures include DNS filtering, coordinating botnet take-downs, DMARC and other methods to curtail phishing, man-in-the-middle attacks, and Border Gateway Protocol hijacks.

Third, the UK, like many other countries, seems to be more open about resorting to the use of offensive cyber operations to protect and defend its interests.

Five years ago, countries were loath to openly talk about offensive cyber capabilities, with many only referencing defensive capabilities in what could be gleaned from official doctrine. Now, the UK is open about the need to invest in its National Offensive Cyber Program to ensure that UK capabilities “can be deployed at a time and place” of its choosing.

The strategy also makes clear that the UK will attribute state-sponsored cyber incidents publicly when “we judge it in the national interest to do so.” Unlike the United States, Germany, Canada, South Korea, and others, the UK has yet to publicly accuse a state of being behind a specific cyber incident. Perhaps the new strategy signals that UK officials will be more open to naming and shaming as part of their cyber deterrence efforts.

Fourth the strategy makes explicit the UK’s desire to develop sovereign cryptographic capabilities, “developed in the UK, by British nationals.” This raises a bunch of questions. Does the UK not trust crypto advocated by its other Five Eyes partners or in standardization bodies? Is it a response to the NSA’s alleged undermining of a widely used crypto standard that came to light as a result of Edward Snowden? Is the UK trying to stimulate the development of crypto that can be decrypted by law enforcement to fix the “going dark” problem?

As with any government strategy document, its implementation will determine its effectiveness. Much of the strategy rests on developing government capabilities with the hope that the UK private sector shamelessly pilfers the best ideas and approaches. Cybersecurity is probably one of the few areas where plagiarism is celebrated, not frowned upon.

DefenseOne:                             Britain Building Cyber Forces to Attack ISIS:  

 UK To Increase National Cyber Defences:                  ECHELON Has Been Watching You All Your Life:

 

 

« New Business Protection From Cyber Attackers
US Army Command Learning Cyberwar From Social Media »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD offers expert-led cybersecurity training to help organisations safeguard their operations and data.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Sophos

Sophos

Sophos is a worldwide leader in next-generation cybersecurity, protecting more than 400,000 organizations of all sizes in more than 150 countries from today’s most advanced cyberthreats.

SecDev

SecDev

SecDev is a consulting firm working at the intersection of geopolitical, digital, urban, energy and cyber risk.

Apomatix

Apomatix

Apomatix is a platform that simplifies the complexity of cyber risk audit and management.

ERNW

ERNW

ERNW is an independent IT Security service provider with a focus on consulting and testing in all areas of IT security.

Infosec (T)

Infosec (T)

Infosec (T) Limited is an independent Tanzania based consultancy specializing in IT governance, information security and IT audit.

Cytomic

Cytomic

Cytomic is the business unit of Panda Security specialized in providing advanced cybersecurity solutions and services to large enterprises.

Data Terminator

Data Terminator

Data Terminator provide a comprehensive range of secure data destruction equipment and services are in compliance to US Department of Defense (DoD) and National Security Agency (NSA) standards.

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI)

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI)

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI) is an independent, global think-tank. We bring together the world’s top global researchers to undertake ground-breaking research on blockchain technology.

ISA Security Compliance Institute (ISCI)

ISA Security Compliance Institute (ISCI)

ISCI, a not-for-profit automation controls industry consortium, manages the ISASecure™ conformance certification program for industrial automation and control systems.

Cybersecure Policy Exchange (CPX)

Cybersecure Policy Exchange (CPX)

Cybersecure Policy Exchange is a new initiative dedicated to advancing effective and innovative public policy in cybersecurity and digital privacy.

Syndis

Syndis

Syndis is a leading information security company helping to defend organizations by providing bespoke services and innovative security solutions in the global market.

Airgap Networks

Airgap Networks

Airgap is fixing the fundamental flaw of excessive trust. We help enterprises modernize their network for a simple and secure infrastructure.

TOTM Technologies

TOTM Technologies

TOTM Technologies provides end-to-end identity management and biometrics products, powering Digital identity and Digital onboarding solutions.

Silverse

Silverse

At Silverse, we specialize in building a comprehensive cybersecurity journey, anchored by our extensive experience, industry expertise, and an ecosystem of trusted partners.

Next DLP

Next DLP

Next DLP (formerly Jazz Networks) is a leading provider of insider risk and data protection solutions.

Cyber Industrial Networks

Cyber Industrial Networks

Cyber Industrial Networks objective is to service the needs of industry in achieving reliable, robust and secure infrastructure that supports productivity.