Some Observations On Britain's New Cyber Security Strategy

A new strategy document spells out an assertive posture by a UK government that’s wary of some shared intelligence capabilities between allies.

At the beginning of November, with much fanfare, the United Kingdom released a new strategy that sets out UK government’s approach to improving the country’s cybersecurity over the next five years.

It follows the UK’s previous effort dating back to 2011, and allocates £1.9 billion ($2.36 billion) over five years, doubling the previous investment of £860 million ($1 billion). This newest five-year plan has the usual fare. It identifies the threats and vulnerabilities facing the UK, creates three pillars using alliteration (defend, deter and develop), and is filled with government-speak that could have been ripped from The Thick of It or Veep (“we need to invest in proofing ourselves against future threats”).

The threats the UK identifies are not surprising. It singles out Russian-language organized cybercrime, state-sponsored threats, terrorist groups (although it caveats that terrorist groups are likely to prefer physical attacks over digital ones for the time being), hacktivists, and oddly, script kiddies.

The strategy also points out the UK’s vulnerabilities, such as the proliferation of insecure internet of things devices, poor cyber hygiene, legacy and unpatched systems, and the availability of off-the-shelf hacking resources. These threats and vulnerabilities are not unique to the UK–every country connected to the internet faces identical or similar challenges.

There are Four Issues from the new Strategy

First, there seems to be an inherent tension between market incentives to spur better cybersecurity and regulation throughout the document. There’s a heavy emphasis placed on the importance of using a mix of intelligence sharing, incentives to spur the creation of cybersecurity products like certification schemes or incentives to create software that is “secure by default,” and using the government as a test case for cybersecurity approaches with the hopes that they cascade into the private sector.

However, the strategy recognizes that much of these same efforts were undertaken in the previous iteration of the strategy, with somewhat limited effect. The strategy leaves the door open to regulation but doesn’t elaborate on what that could look like. There’s also no mention of the EU network and information security directive, which the UK is still technically required to implement until it formally leaves the European Union.

Second, the strategy places heavy emphasis on taking “active cyber defense” measures to protect the UK. Generally, the term active cyber defense has been synonymous with hacking back, whereby companies and other non-government actors are allowed to retaliate in cyberspace and is controversial.

In its strategy, that’s not what the UK is advocating. Instead, active cyber defense is defined as a series of technical measures, taken by government in cooperation with industry (mostly communications service providers), to make it “significantly harder to attack UK internet services and users.”

The technical measures include DNS filtering, coordinating botnet take-downs, DMARC and other methods to curtail phishing, man-in-the-middle attacks, and Border Gateway Protocol hijacks.

Third, the UK, like many other countries, seems to be more open about resorting to the use of offensive cyber operations to protect and defend its interests.

Five years ago, countries were loath to openly talk about offensive cyber capabilities, with many only referencing defensive capabilities in what could be gleaned from official doctrine. Now, the UK is open about the need to invest in its National Offensive Cyber Program to ensure that UK capabilities “can be deployed at a time and place” of its choosing.

The strategy also makes clear that the UK will attribute state-sponsored cyber incidents publicly when “we judge it in the national interest to do so.” Unlike the United States, Germany, Canada, South Korea, and others, the UK has yet to publicly accuse a state of being behind a specific cyber incident. Perhaps the new strategy signals that UK officials will be more open to naming and shaming as part of their cyber deterrence efforts.

Fourth the strategy makes explicit the UK’s desire to develop sovereign cryptographic capabilities, “developed in the UK, by British nationals.” This raises a bunch of questions. Does the UK not trust crypto advocated by its other Five Eyes partners or in standardization bodies? Is it a response to the NSA’s alleged undermining of a widely used crypto standard that came to light as a result of Edward Snowden? Is the UK trying to stimulate the development of crypto that can be decrypted by law enforcement to fix the “going dark” problem?

As with any government strategy document, its implementation will determine its effectiveness. Much of the strategy rests on developing government capabilities with the hope that the UK private sector shamelessly pilfers the best ideas and approaches. Cybersecurity is probably one of the few areas where plagiarism is celebrated, not frowned upon.

DefenseOne:                             Britain Building Cyber Forces to Attack ISIS:  

 UK To Increase National Cyber Defences:                  ECHELON Has Been Watching You All Your Life:

 

 

« New Business Protection From Cyber Attackers
US Army Command Learning Cyberwar From Social Media »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

Jooble

Jooble

Jooble is a job search aggregator operating in 71 countries worldwide. We simplify the job search process by displaying active job ads from major job boards and career sites across the internet.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

Cristie Data

Cristie Data

Cristie have been a trusted, innovative and leading edge data storage, backup and virtualisation solutions provider across all sectors of industry for over 40 years.

One Identity

One Identity

One Identity delivers identity governance, access management, and privileged account management solutions that facilitate and secure your digital transformation.

Fox-IT

Fox-IT

Fox-IT prevents, solves and mitigates the most serious cyber threats with smart solutions for governmental bodies, defense, law enforcement, critical infrastructure, banking and large enterprises.

Resolver

Resolver

Resolver’s Integrated Risk Management platform helps plan and prepare your organization to limit the likeliness or impact of security risk and compliance events from occurring.

Maritime Cybersecurity Center (MCC)

Maritime Cybersecurity Center (MCC)

Maritime Cybersecurity Center is a not-for-profit organization focused on regional cybersecurity excellence and readiness, with a special emphasis on the maritime community.

STM

STM

STM provides system engineering, technical support, project management, technology transfer and logistics support services for the Turkish Armed Forces.

IoTsploit

IoTsploit

IoTsploit provides 20/20 visibility of network connections, protecting critical infrastructure assets from IoT vulnerabilities.

Civic Technologies

Civic Technologies

Civic’s Secure Identity Platform (SIP) uses a verified identity for multi-factor authentication on web and mobile apps without the need for usernames or passwords.

Blu Venture Investors (BVI)

Blu Venture Investors (BVI)

Blu Venture Investors is a venture capital firm that supports early stage companies with a focus on technology in diverse domains including cybersecurity, IoT, defense and homeland security.

Knovos

Knovos

Knovos is a leading technology innovator developing solutions for automating, integrating, and innovating Information Governance.

Thrive

Thrive

Thrive delivers the experience, resources, and expertise needed to create a comprehensive cyber security plan that covers your vital data, SaaS applications, end users, and critical infrastructure.

Stealth Software Technologies

Stealth Software Technologies

Stealth Software Technologies is focused on the generation of research and software products focused on applied cryptography and cybersecurity.

MVP Tech

MVP Tech

MVP Tech designs and deploys next generation infrastructures where Security and Technology converge.

Vala Secure

Vala Secure

Vala Secure is a cybersecurity and compliance consultancy that always stays ahead of regulations, future threats and ever-changing security environments.

Data Pie Cybersecurity

Data Pie Cybersecurity

The Data Pie Cybersecurity Consulting offers a 360° around protection for your IT security. Security awareness solutions and consulting.

Peris.ai

Peris.ai

Peris.ai is a cybersecurity as a service startup that protects businesses and organizations from online threats.