Some Observations On Britain's New Cyber Security Strategy

A new strategy document spells out an assertive posture by a UK government that’s wary of some shared intelligence capabilities between allies.

At the beginning of November, with much fanfare, the United Kingdom released a new strategy that sets out UK government’s approach to improving the country’s cybersecurity over the next five years.

It follows the UK’s previous effort dating back to 2011, and allocates £1.9 billion ($2.36 billion) over five years, doubling the previous investment of £860 million ($1 billion). This newest five-year plan has the usual fare. It identifies the threats and vulnerabilities facing the UK, creates three pillars using alliteration (defend, deter and develop), and is filled with government-speak that could have been ripped from The Thick of It or Veep (“we need to invest in proofing ourselves against future threats”).

The threats the UK identifies are not surprising. It singles out Russian-language organized cybercrime, state-sponsored threats, terrorist groups (although it caveats that terrorist groups are likely to prefer physical attacks over digital ones for the time being), hacktivists, and oddly, script kiddies.

The strategy also points out the UK’s vulnerabilities, such as the proliferation of insecure internet of things devices, poor cyber hygiene, legacy and unpatched systems, and the availability of off-the-shelf hacking resources. These threats and vulnerabilities are not unique to the UK–every country connected to the internet faces identical or similar challenges.

There are Four Issues from the new Strategy

First, there seems to be an inherent tension between market incentives to spur better cybersecurity and regulation throughout the document. There’s a heavy emphasis placed on the importance of using a mix of intelligence sharing, incentives to spur the creation of cybersecurity products like certification schemes or incentives to create software that is “secure by default,” and using the government as a test case for cybersecurity approaches with the hopes that they cascade into the private sector.

However, the strategy recognizes that much of these same efforts were undertaken in the previous iteration of the strategy, with somewhat limited effect. The strategy leaves the door open to regulation but doesn’t elaborate on what that could look like. There’s also no mention of the EU network and information security directive, which the UK is still technically required to implement until it formally leaves the European Union.

Second, the strategy places heavy emphasis on taking “active cyber defense” measures to protect the UK. Generally, the term active cyber defense has been synonymous with hacking back, whereby companies and other non-government actors are allowed to retaliate in cyberspace and is controversial.

In its strategy, that’s not what the UK is advocating. Instead, active cyber defense is defined as a series of technical measures, taken by government in cooperation with industry (mostly communications service providers), to make it “significantly harder to attack UK internet services and users.”

The technical measures include DNS filtering, coordinating botnet take-downs, DMARC and other methods to curtail phishing, man-in-the-middle attacks, and Border Gateway Protocol hijacks.

Third, the UK, like many other countries, seems to be more open about resorting to the use of offensive cyber operations to protect and defend its interests.

Five years ago, countries were loath to openly talk about offensive cyber capabilities, with many only referencing defensive capabilities in what could be gleaned from official doctrine. Now, the UK is open about the need to invest in its National Offensive Cyber Program to ensure that UK capabilities “can be deployed at a time and place” of its choosing.

The strategy also makes clear that the UK will attribute state-sponsored cyber incidents publicly when “we judge it in the national interest to do so.” Unlike the United States, Germany, Canada, South Korea, and others, the UK has yet to publicly accuse a state of being behind a specific cyber incident. Perhaps the new strategy signals that UK officials will be more open to naming and shaming as part of their cyber deterrence efforts.

Fourth the strategy makes explicit the UK’s desire to develop sovereign cryptographic capabilities, “developed in the UK, by British nationals.” This raises a bunch of questions. Does the UK not trust crypto advocated by its other Five Eyes partners or in standardization bodies? Is it a response to the NSA’s alleged undermining of a widely used crypto standard that came to light as a result of Edward Snowden? Is the UK trying to stimulate the development of crypto that can be decrypted by law enforcement to fix the “going dark” problem?

As with any government strategy document, its implementation will determine its effectiveness. Much of the strategy rests on developing government capabilities with the hope that the UK private sector shamelessly pilfers the best ideas and approaches. Cybersecurity is probably one of the few areas where plagiarism is celebrated, not frowned upon.

DefenseOne:                             Britain Building Cyber Forces to Attack ISIS:  

 UK To Increase National Cyber Defences:                  ECHELON Has Been Watching You All Your Life:

 

 

« New Business Protection From Cyber Attackers
US Army Command Learning Cyberwar From Social Media »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

NordLayer

NordLayer

NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses — from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security. 

Resecurity

Resecurity

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

KE-CIRT/CC

KE-CIRT/CC

KE-CIRT/CC is the national Computer Incident Response Team for Kenya.

Guardian360

Guardian360

The Guardian360 platform offers unrivalled insight into the security of your applications and IT infrastructure.

Neoteric Networks

Neoteric Networks

We deliver a no nonsense procedure to implementing technology. The technology selection process ensures that all customers enjoy an engineered methodology implementing technology.

HCL Technologies

HCL Technologies

HCL offer an integrated portfolio of products, solutions and services built around Digital, IoT, Cloud, Automation, Cybersecurity, Analytics, Infrastructure Management and Engineering Services.

Quest Software

Quest Software

Simple IT management for a complex world. Whether it’s digital transformation, cloud expansion, security threats or something new, Quest helps you solve complex problems with simple solutions.

FirstPoint

FirstPoint

FirstPoint has developed the market’s most advanced solution for securing cellular devices, including mobile phones and IoT products, by blocking malicious data leakage.

SuperCom

SuperCom

SuperCom are a global secure solutions integrator and technology provider for governments and other consumers facing organizations around the world.

Mr Backup (MRB)

Mr Backup (MRB)

MRB offers Data Protection as a Service for businesses looking to reduce the time, cost and complexity of securing your company data.

Focus on Security

Focus on Security

Focus on Security are Cyber Security recruitment specialists. We’re dedicated to connecting you with the top Cyber Security talent across the globe. We focus on partnerships and results.

Siren

Siren

Siren provides the leading Investigative Intelligence Platform to some of the world’s leading Law Enforcement, National Security and Cyber threat investigators.

Sidcon International Consulting Company

Sidcon International Consulting Company

SIDCON International Consulting Company has been providing consulting services since 2002 for private and public organizations in Ukraine and other countries.

Intertec Systems

Intertec Systems

Intertec Systems is an award-winning, global IT solutions and services provider that specializes in digital transformation, cybersecurity, sustainability, and cloud services.

Resonance Security

Resonance Security

Resonance offers powerful cybersecurity aggregation software that makes protecting against full spectrum cybersecurity threats effortless no matter what your technical level, budget, or scope.

CoGuard

CoGuard

CoGuard is a patented solution that uses AI driven automation to provide fast, cost effective white-box penetration testing, infrastructure audits and infrastructure design services.

GAM Tech

GAM Tech

GAM Tech is a Managed IT Service Provider that serves small and medium sized businesses in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec.

Vulnify

Vulnify

At Vulnify, we’re revolutionizing the way businesses identify and manage security vulnerabilities.