State Proxies & Plausible Deniability: Challenging Conventional Wisdom

plausibledeniability.jpg


It is often argued that states use proxies to claim plausible deniability for their actions. This logic certainly has a historical basis. In the Cold War era, when direct war between Russia and the USA was too risky, offensive actions conducted via conduits reduced the risk of retaliation. Likewise, proxies in the cyber domain are able to ‘muddle attribution’.  For example, before and during Russia's invasion of Georgia in 2008, Russian cyber militias disabled key portions of Georgia’s communication system. This was convenient as for the attack to work, civilian systems in third-party states needed to be compromised - if a Russian state actor was implicated, the attack would have violated tenants of armed conflict. Further, assuming Russian government involvement in the Estonian 2007 attacks, the Kremlin was able to retaliate to Estonia whilst circumventing accountability and avoiding some of the diplomatic costs of direct action. 

Whilst this conventional wisdom is not dismissed, the extent to which it holds true is questioned. The appeal of proxies, for the purposes of plausible deniability, has been overemphasised for two reasons.

First, cyber attacks that stem from a state can already have a significant degree of plausible deniability, given the difficulties in attributing cyber attacks. For example, attacks can be rerouted to travel through other states whilst comments placed in computer code can be altered to mimic other languages and culture.

Second, in response to difficulties in attribution, circumstantial evidence is increasingly being used in the forensic process⁠. For example although the alleged involvement of the Russian state in Estonian denial of service attacks in 2007 remains unproven, Russia’s clear incentive to retaliate in response to the relocation of a Russian war memorial, accompanied by the lack of Russian assistance in preventing the attacks, strongly suggests their tacit support. Jason Healey has previously criticised the international community for treating every state as if it were ‘Cyber Somalia’, unable to restrain attacks from its territory or mitigate their impact. Healey insists that states should be less reluctant to place blame on other states when cyber attacks stem from their territory. As this use of circumstantial evidence becomes more widely accepted, the plausible deniability associated with proxies becomes harder to claim. 

Therefore, whilst difficulties in attribution contribute to the appeal of proxies, a state's ability to claim plausible deniability has arguably been overemphasised. But, given the popularity of proxies in the cyber domain, they must appeal for other reasons. 

Proxies appeal for a variety of reasons.  One of the most significant drivers is a process of power diffusion. Characteristics of the cyber domain have facilitated the growth of a number of non-state actors. Given the low barriers to entry, a number of non-traditional actors are able to make meaningful contributions. Unlike fighter jets and navy vessels, sophisticated tools in the cyber domain can be developed by small businesses and starts-ups. Given the current shortage of cyber security related skills, governments struggle to compete with the salaries offered by the private sector or the economic opportunities that exist in online criminal activity. GCHQ has struggled to retain employees with technically capable staff able to command considerably higher salaries in the private sector

For less powerful states, proxies provide an opportunity to bolster their capability in a power balancing process against stronger adversaries. Cyber militias in a number of weaker states such as Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan have all threatened to retaliate against future Russian cyber or kinetic attacks. When states lack internal capability, proxies offer a viable strategy to help balance the odds. 

Working with proxies may also reflect national culture. The Kremlin has historically held ties with organised crime and mafia groups and these relationships have extended into the cyber domain. As previously discussed in this blog, within Estonia, a number of political, cultural and historical characteristics facilitate the participation of civil society state cyber security activity.

States may also use proxies as they are cost effective. Outsourcing means that states are not faced with a range of costs including sick leave, holiday pay and training of full-time employees. This is especially attractive given that returns on investment in training are particularly low: many government workers will quickly move to the private sector after they have finished government training, given the economic opportunities. In addition, as the power diffusion process has empowered a number of actors, states should have a healthy choice of firms and organisations to work with, theoretically increasing the efficiency and driving down the costs of outsourcing. 

It is clear states need to utilise proxies effectively in the cyber domain; plausible deniability being one of a number of benefits.  Yet, government officials should proceed with caution. Proxy actors operate outside the control of government, affording them an unpredictability unwelcome by policymakers. With proxy actors representing a risky, albeit necessary, resource, perhaps the real challenge for states is learning when to say no.

Jamie Collier is completing  a Doctorate in Cyber Security at Oxford University

http://www.cybersecurityrelations.com

 

« Russia in Ukraine & Syria: US Revise Cyber Budget
UK’s Surveillance Dragnet Legal Challenge »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Check Point

Directory of Suppliers

Alvacomm

Alvacomm

Alvacomm offers holistic VIP cybersecurity services, providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. Our solutions include risk assessment, threat detection, incident response.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

CSI Consulting Services

CSI Consulting Services

Get Advice From The Experts: * Training * Penetration Testing * Data Governance * GDPR Compliance. Connecting you to the best in the business.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

Resecurity

Resecurity

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Assured Data Protection

Assured Data Protection

Assured Data Protection specialises in data protection and disaster recovery services for large SME and enterprise organisations.

Novastor

Novastor

NovaStor® is an award-winning, international data backup and recovery software company with solutions supporting physical, virtual and cloud environments.

Blockchains LLC

Blockchains LLC

Blockchains is committed to changing the world for the better. Using blockchain and other innovative technologies, we’ll build new systems, new security, and new interactions.

Adyta

Adyta

Adyta specializes in cybersecurity solutions adapted to the needs of sovereign institutions, business groups and other organizations that handle information and sensitive or classified data.

CloudSEK

CloudSEK

CloudSEK has set its sights on building the world’s fastest and most reliable AI technology, that identifies and resolves digital threats.

oneclick

oneclick

oneclick is a central access and distribution platform in the cloud, enabling the management of the entire technology stack for application provisioning.

Phakamo Tech

Phakamo Tech

Phakamo Tech offers a full set of governance, risk, compliance, cybersecurity and Microsoft Cloud services that include consulting, planning, implementation and cyber incident response.

PSafe

PSafe

PSafe is a leading provider of mobile privacy, security, and performance apps. We deliver innovative products that protect your freedom to safely connect, share, play, express and explore online.

Persona Identities

Persona Identities

At Persona, we’re humanizing online identity by helping companies verify that their users are who they say they are.

Incyber

Incyber

Incyber is a fully integrated network and cybersecurity solutions provider contracted to safeguard public and private enterprise, high value data and sensitive industries.

SkillsDA

SkillsDA

SkillsDA is pureplay company in cyber security involved in capacity building towards National Security.

BlazeGuard

BlazeGuard

At BlazeGuard, we understand that navigating the complex world of cybersecurity can be challenging. That’s why we make it our mission to simplify the process for you.

IT.ie

IT.ie

IT.ie are a comprehensive provider of Managed IT Services, Cloud Solutions, Cyber Security, and proactive IT support services.

Veracity Trust Network

Veracity Trust Network

Veracity Trust Network safeguards organisations from the threat of bot attacks on their public facing platforms.

Digital Twin Consortium (DTC)

Digital Twin Consortium (DTC)

Digital Twin Consortium is a global ecosystem of users who are driving best practices for digital twin usage and defining requirements for new digital twin standards.

REAL Security

REAL Security

REAL Security is a market leader across the Adriatic region in value-added distribution in the field of IT Security & virtualisation.