How CISOs Can Speak The Language Of Risk & Resilience

Uploaded on 2025-04-24 in TECHNOLOGY--Resilience, FREE TO VIEW

It’s high time we talked about the changing face of cybersecurity leadership. It used to be that the CISO was the security gatekeeper – buried in firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and policy enforcement. But trust me, those days are long gone.

Today’s CISO has one foot in the data centre and the other in the boardroom.

They are expected to understand the threat landscape, manage growing technical complexity, implement and enforce new security standards, and, on top of all that, translate it into something the business can act on. It's not enough to simply “do security” – it must be done in a language that other decision-makers with a seat at the head table can understand.

This issue is being driven by a regulatory wave that’s washing over every sector, from finance and healthcare to energy and manufacturing. Frameworks like DORA and NIS2 demand more from executives and board members who are directly accountable for cyber risk. For instance, DORA reserves the right to fine EU businesses 2% of their global revenue or €10 million – whichever is higher – for non-compliance.

This accountability changes everything. It means CISOs must step out of their cyber comfort zone and become strategic storytellers, bridging the gap between cybersecurity and businesses priorities like risk, resilience, and the bottom line.

If it sounds like CISOs are getting singled out here, think again. It also means the boardroom can no longer afford to treat cybersecurity as someone else’s problem. The future belongs to organisations where technical and business leaders meet in the middle – and speak the same language.

Stepping Into The Boardroom

Cyber risk doesn’t always look like a firewall misconfiguration or a zero-day exploit. More often, it hides in plain sight – the shadow IT tools no one’s tracking, duplicated systems nobody's using, or legacy infrastructure still propping up core services. This is what we really mean when we talk about technical debt. It’s not just outdated systems; it’s the accumulation of past decisions that made sense at the time but have since become blind spots. And the problem with blind spots is that, well, we’re blind to them – until it’s too late. For CISOs trying to keep up with regulatory expectations, evolving threats, and budget pressures all at once, understanding where that debt lives is the first step toward visualising risk in a way that other members of the C-suite will care about.

That starts with visibility. Not just internal visibility, but external as well, because you can’t defend against what you can’t see. The most effective CISOs are leaning on practices like external attack surface management (EASM) to build a full inventory of internet-facing assets, third-party connections, and potential entry points. From there, they are mapping those risks back to critical business systems, prioritising them based on impact, and tying remediation efforts to measurable outcomes like operational continuity, regulatory compliance, or customer trust. It’s a shift away from “we need to patch this vulnerability” toward “here’s what’s at stake if we don’t.” And that’s the language that gets attention beyond the security team.

Meeting In The Middle

Cybersecurity teams live in a world of threat vectors, CVEs, zero-days, and MITRE matrices. The board lives in a world of revenue forecasts, regulatory exposure, and brand equity. It’s not that they don’t care about security; it’s that they only really need to care about what it means for the business. And that’s exactly why security leaders must become translators. The challenge is crossing that bridge without diluting the message.

Boards don’t need the intimate details. They need a clear picture of potential business impact: how a breach might affect uptime, compliance, reputation, or shareholder confidence.

Now more than ever, especially with regulations like NIS2 holding the executive leadership team’s feet to the fire, boards are looking for clarity. Not scare tactics, not jargon – just stuff they can run with.

That means changing how information is framed and presented. Forget dashboards filled with red alerts and acronyms. CISOs and their teams must show how cyber risk aligns with strategic objectives, and how security investments protect the things that matter most. Some CISOs are using security ratings, benchmarking data, or external audits to show where the organisation stands relative to peers. Others are drawing on real-world scenarios to make abstract risks tangible – “could that happen to us?” A ransomware simulation that walks the board through a potential outage, including cost implications and reputational damage, can do more to move the needle than a hundred technical slide decks. Because once the board understands the “why,” the “what” and “how” become much easier to support.

Here's the thing: the most effective CISOs today aren’t just securing infrastructure, they’re securing trust.

That means listening to business priorities, speaking in outcomes, and using narrative to drive meaningful discussions around risk and resilience. Because in a world where cyber threats are business threats, the ability to communicate is just as critical as the ability to defend.

Tim Grieveson is CSO and EVP Information Security at ThingsRecon

Image: Pavel Danilyuk

You Might Also Read:

The Corporate CISO Role Is Evolving:

If you like this website and use the comprehensive 7,000+ service supplier Directory, you can get unrestricted access, including the exclusive in-depth Directors Report series, by signing up for a Premium Subscription.